Authentic Travelers Don’t Eat McDonalds

Posted by Dan on October 10, 2009 in Worldview

You seek out the most westernized mall you can find, order a burger and fries, buy a ticket to the latest Hollywood blockbuster and completely zone out to all the things far more exotic around you. Just don’t tell anyone or you will be labeled a bad traveler who may as well have stayed at home.

The thing is this isn’t at all uncommon; in fact those who only eat local food in local haunts and only experience local entertainment are the exception, not the rule. For long term travelers indulging in an occasional western meal and things more familiar is not even something they really think about, does it really do any harm? Unless you are continually isolating yourself from the culture around you it is pretty insignificant, hardly something to get defensive or aggressive about.

Maybe some people are actually trying too hard to be an authentic traveler; the thing is if you are “trying” to be any sort of traveler you are kind of missing the point. Lets admit it, it’s backpackers who like to distinguish between travelers and tourists, but I see backpackers who never leave the backpacker crowd, only getting to know other travelers, is that really travel? I thought they wanted to experience new cultures, does a cursory trek to a hill tribe really cover that? Maybe there is a certain level of participation as a traveler you need to take part in to earn your stripes, the problem is it will be different with each new person you ask.

We all have our own prejudices and just because I don’t think munching down a Big Mac in Asia is a crime doesn’t mean other things don’t bug me.

Why do women get around beaches in bikinis or sunbath topless in places where you don’t see a local girl with less than shorts and a t-shirt bathing? Complaining about eating rice three days in a row on a Thai tour won’t win you many hearts either. And my pet hate, missionaries. All of these examples are essentially people traveling without showing respect or a willingness to see a country beyond the aesthetically pleasing sights it has to offer.

Yep maybe I am a hypocrite. By now most of us realize we can’t convince people to change their ways (except missionaries), some people are completely set regardless of what their experiences are, and still experience is the most common catalyst in someone changing their viewpoint.

For some travel is about sightseeing and luxury hotels. Different people want different things from it, not everyone is after a life changing experience and a new perspective on the world. The problem is we all have a different ideas about what makes a good traveler but sometimes it’s like comparing chalk and cheese. I’m not trying to be diplomatic, if you want to see the world not just for it’s sights, you have to be involved in what you find around you, otherwise what is the point? Who cares if you eat at Macca’s, the question is are you really getting what you want out of your travels?

Tiny URL for this post: http://tinyurl.com/2bf4drz